[Fwd: [alberg30] Take non A-30 stuff off the list please!]

[RABBIT649 at aol.com]

From: RABBIT649 at aol.com

In a message dated 2/5/00 11:53:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
FINNUS505 at aol.com writes:

> From: FINNUS505 at aol.com
>  
>  ...... and related
>  matters........
>  
>  One more thought; just to be a further help to those who wish to spend 
less 
>  time on line sorting email they may not be interested in, perhaps we 
should 
>  be more specific in the subject on our postings.  If the subject can be 
>  depended on to reflect the actual content of our letter, and not simply be 
> an 
>  're;response', unless that is actualy accurate, then maybe that will be a 
>  fair compromise to be struck.
>  Whadayathink mates?
Sounds good to me, Lee, but we have to also deal with "topic drift" vs 
"recognizability of thread". For example, I could have called this "Re: 
subject headers", but would others have recognized it as a continuation of 
the original subject, especially if they had missed your new 'tack' in the 
subject matter?
Paul
#23 Ashwagh

--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------

Shop for your Valentine at eGroups.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/SparksValentine6 ">Click Here</a>

------------------------------------------------------------------------


 949857833.0