<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=217281522-04062001>George
and others,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=217281522-04062001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=217281522-04062001>I used
the 4200 which is manufactured to be removed following application. I had to
remove one forward chain plate this spring that was bonded with 4200 3 yrs
ago. I did not have any issues removing, cleaning and replacing the chain
plate with 4200.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=217281522-04062001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=217281522-04062001>Stephen Sousa</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=217281522-04062001>#114</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=217281522-04062001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=217281522-04062001>
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Brian and Elaine Timmins
[mailto:timmins@optonline.net]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 04, 2001 5:12
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Post to Publiclist<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Alberg30] Re: Bedding
Shroud Tangs<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To George and others recommending Rule
Elastometric,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I just checked the sites
offered up by George and the info there in. The description of Elastometric
Bedding Compound sounds very much like 5200 as far as it's tenacious bond
strength is concerned. Is it similar to 5200 at least as far as this is
concerned? I've generally stopped using 5200 for exactly that reason and I'm
not looking forward to removing anything I've ever bedded with it. On the
other hand, when bedding shroud tangs is it better to use a product that
adheres and flexes like this.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I can't find the elastometric
compound around here (easily anyway) and I'm looking at the first weather
window to get this done. I already own a cartridge of 5200 and one of 101. If
you had to choose between the two, which one would you use?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards and thanks,
Brian</FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>