[Public-list] baby forestay
John G. Morrison
goalnet at direct.ca
Wed Jun 22 18:39:48 PDT 2005
Hi Randy: Re your query re reefpoints I spoke to Dave Miller of North Sails
in Vancouver and he said he used 11, 24 and 37 as percentages of the luff
or the distance down the mast which is a different way than your way. Taking
into account the sail does not go to bottom of the mast, then your use of
the 50 percent figure seemed excessive to him. and he suggested the use of
the lesser figure and then go to your storm trisail for the average
huuricane. Hope this helps Regards John Antares 382
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Katz" <randyk at bertschi.org>
To: "Alberg list" <public-list at alberg30.org>
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Public-list] baby forestay
> I read a book once. It was about sailboats. (Remember that Jimmy Durante
> song?)
>
> Anyway, in the book it showed a baby stay attached at the deck, above the
> fwd bulkhead. An L-shaped bracket ran half on the bulkhead, half on the
> under side of the deck there. That bracket served as an attachment point
> for a base plate with C-ring on the deck which was through bolted to the
L.
>
> I have no idea about where on the mast the other end should go.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> on 6/6/05 9:00 AM, public-list-request at alberg30.org at
> public-list-request at alberg30.org wrote:
>
> > Re: [Public-list] baby forestay
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Randy Katz#249 Bellingham/Seattle
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public-list mailing list
> Public-list at alberg30.org
> http://alberg30.org/mailman/listinfo/public-list
>
1119490788.0
More information about the Public-List
mailing list